By Mary Katherine Ray
From Rio Grande Sierran, March/April 2008
Hundreds of people attended the Mexican wolf scoping meetings in December and thousands wrote a letter advocating for our lobos. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service received over 13,000 comments, and the vast majority of those were in favor of wolf recovery. If you were one of them, thank you! The Service will be reviewing them and will have draft alternatives out in about a year.
Can wolves wait that long?
Photo courtesy of US Fish and Wildlife Service.
It’s easy to forget that, like wolves, elk were also exterminated from the Southwest. It wasn’t a deliberate persecution with poison and traps, but a consequence of unregulated and relentless hunting. It’s hard to believe, given how common elk are now, that by the early 1900s, there were no more elk in the Southwest. A few decades later, wolves were also cast into the abyss of oblivion with an effective trapping and poisoning program. They and their howls, like elk bugles, echoed no more in our rocky canyons.
In the 1950s elk were brought back to the Gila from Yellowstone National Park. Like wolves, reintroduced elk faced opposition from some ranchers. They compete with livestock for forage and, unlike deer, eat pretty much exactly the same thing cows do. But think how much poorer the landscape would be without elk. Their presence has been a tremendous success story. The sound of bugles in the fall are exhilarating and wonderful. And there is no denying that a huge elk-hunting industry has sprung up, which in some cases offers enough income to allow people to stay on the land who might otherwise have had to get jobs in town. All this would be completely absent if, back then, those few detractors had had their way.
We hear bad things about wolves from similar detractors today. Just before Mexican wolves were snuffed out forever, the last five in the wild were captured in Mexico and placed into captivity. Only one was female and she was pregnant with a litter by a male who was never captured. She had the litter of the unknown male and later she and one of the other captured males went on to produce offspring. An additional two adults were found in a zoo in Mexico City and two more in captivity at the Ghost Ranch were also determined to be purebred lobos and were added to the breeding program. The entire world population of Mexican wolves is descended from these seven individuals.
These wolves came as close to the brink of extinction as a species can get. But they could be a huge success story, too. Unfortunately, the yearly count has just come in from the Fish and Wildlife Service. Over the entire remote recovery area encompassing 4.4 million acres of Arizona and New Mexico, there are only 52 wolves in the wild today. Only 23 are in New Mexico. All together there are only three breeding pairs. It is not because wolves can’t be successful in their ancestral home. The reason there are so few is that too many are being removed by the very program that is supposed to be recovering them. Twenty-two wolves were either trapped or shot in 2007. Nineteen of those were for depredating on livestock. The other two wandered out of bounds.
There is an administrative protocol called “standard operating procedure 13” that allows the Fish and Wildlife Service to trap or shoot wolves that have been involved in three livestock deaths in a year. But this protocol is just that – administrative. It isn’t required by the Endangered Species Act, which mandates that wolves be recovered. Clearly, we have to find a better way to mitigate the interaction between wolves and cows so that cows don’t always have the final say. These are animals on land belonging to everyone, and unlike cattle, wolves are a historic part of the biotic community. Cattle should not always be elevated above wolves or any wildlife.
Elk have been a big success, but a prosperous and diverse biotic community needs its predators. Unlike humans, wolves can kill only what they can physically run down: the sick, the old, the injured. Just the presence of wolves causes elk to move around more, resulting in less overgrazing and a positive cascade toward biodiversity all down the food chain. As with elk, we and the landscape would be much impoverished without wolves.
You can help wolves again by writing to Benjamin Tuggle, Regional Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service, at the New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office, 2105 Osuna NE, Albuquerque, NM 87113; RDTuggle@fws.gov.
Also write Bruce Thompson, Director of NM Game and Fish, at PO Box 25112, Santa Fe, NM 87504; bruce.thompson@state.nm.us.
And write Alfredo Montoya, Chairman of the NM Game Commission, at PO Box 856, San Juan Pueblo, NM 87566; alfredo@nnmc.edu.
Also write Governor Richardson and let him know that enough is enough. This killing of our wolves must stop.
For more information, contact Mary Katherine Ray.
The Mexican Wolf ("lobo") is the smallest, most rare, and most southern subspecies of Gray Wolf in North America. Its normal range is the Sonoran and Chihuahuan deserts of Mexico the southwestern United States.
At the beginning of the 20th century, loss of natural prey such as deer and elk caused the wolf to attack livestock. This resulted in intense, successful efforts to eradicate the wolf. It was all but eliminated from the wild by the 1970s and declared endangered in 1976. In 1997, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) began reintroducing Mexican Wolves into the Apache and Gila National Forests of Arizona and New Mexico.
For more information, see the Fish and Wildlife Service
Mexican Wolf Recovery Program website.
Also, see the new www.mexicanwolves.org website.
From Southwest Environmental Center, Feb. 2007